nQuorate
Log In

From question to insight in hours, not weeks.

nQuorate is a simulation platform hosting thousands of pre-built digital HCP personas. Built for Brand and Insights teams to test early stage TPPs, messages, and concepts — at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional fieldwork.

nQuorate · HCP Panel
Beta

Study

TPP Testing — 1L non-targetable mNSCLC

Panel

316 HCPs

Medical Oncologists Academic Community US 20+ monthly mNSCLC patients

LIKELIHOOD TO PRESCRIBE (T2B%)

% rating 4 or 5 on a 1–5 scale for eligible 1L mNSCLC patients

Product X
72%
Product Y
58%

HCP verbatim

Why
Product X’s median PFS advantage and the q3w dosing are what would tip me toward it in a 1L decision.

— Medical Oncologist · Community · US

Product Y’s tolerability profile gives me more flexibility with frail patients — for 1L decisions, that nuance matters.

— Medical Oncologist · Academic · US

In community practice, q3w dosing means fewer chair days — that operational difference shapes my routine choice as much as efficacy data.

— Medical Oncologist · Community · US

+ 314 more responses available

Study

Message Testing — Severe Uncontrolled Asthma

Panel

408 HCPs

Pulmonologists Allergists PCPs US

Most motivating message (% selected)

Single-select among five tested messages

M1Reduction in annual exacerbation rate
31%
M2Oral corticosteroid sparing
14%
M3Lung function improvement (FEV1)
23%
M4Onset of clinical response
18%
M5Long-term safety profile
14%

HCP verbatim

Why
Exacerbations are what land my patients in the ED — anything that meaningfully reduces them is the message that moves me.

— Pulmonologist · Academic · US

M3 resonates with my atopic SUA patients — they track their FEV1 closely and want to see measurable lung function gains.

— Allergist · Academic · US

+ 406 more responses available

Study

Core Visual Aid Testing — Rheumatoid Arthritis

Panel

276 HCPs

Rheumatologists Board Certified 3+ Years Experience US

% selecting page as most critical to story

Five-page detail aid, rank-and-react methodology

Page 1Indication
12%
Page 2MOA
18%
Page 3Efficacy
41%
Page 4Safety
22%
Page 5Dosing
7%

HCP verbatim

Why
The efficacy page is where I decide whether to keep listening — if those numbers don’t hold up, the rest of the conversation doesn’t matter.

— Rheumatologist · Academic · US

I find myself flipping back to the MOA page for new mechanisms — for JAKs especially, that grounding shapes how I read everything that follows.

— Rheumatologist · Community · US

+ 274 more responses available
12× Faster than traditional fieldwork
80% Lower cost per study
10,000+ Digital HCP personas In development
24/7 Always-on HCP panel

How it works

Three steps from question to insight.

  1. 01 Step

    Choose your panel

    Select from thousands of HCP personas built on published research, real-world data, and proprietary modeling. Filter on demographics, behavioural or attitudinal traits to select the relevant panel for your study.

    Panel

    Selected316 HCPs
    Medical Oncologist US 3+ years

    +291 more matching personas in panel

  2. 02 Step

    Design your study

    Select from a library of pre-built study templates, or describe your objective and let AI agents draft a custom questionnaire following life science market research conventions.

    A

    Use a pre-defined template

    Library

    TPP

    Testing

    Message

    Testing

    Concept

    Testing

    • Motivation to Rx
    • Clarity of Message
    • Believability of Claim
    Or
    B

    Author a custom questionnaire

    AI agents
    “Test 5 message frames for SUA against community + academic pulmonologists, with a follow-up on OCS sparing.”
    Drafting questionnaire — 5 messages, T2B + verbatims
  3. 03 Step

    Get decision-ready insights

    Receive comparative analyses, key drivers, and presentation-ready findings within hours. Ask follow-up questions against the same panel, test alternatives, and run what-if scenarios — without commissioning a new study.

    Insights · Message Testing

    Export

    Most motivating

    M1 · 31%

    M1
    31%
    M2
    14%
    M3
    23%
    M4
    18%
    M5
    14%
    62%

    Top driver segment

    Academic pulmonologists

    T2B lift +18 pts vs. community

    Why M1 won

    % of HCPs citing

    • ED admissions are top concern
      73%
    • Patient-actionable metric
      58%
    • Aligns with GINA guideline framing
      41%
    M3
    M1+M3

    Recommendation

    Test a hybrid M1 + M3 variant

    Tighter FEV1 framing projected to lift T2B

Use cases

Pre-built study templates for common research questions.

Each template is pre-configured with instrument design and output structure — adapted from established market research methodologies.

Target Product Profile Testing

Stress-test claims, dosing, and positioning against HCP expectations before committing to a TPP direction.

Indicate your likelihood to prescribe Product X for eligible 1L mNSCLC patients.

Prod X
Prod Y
Ctrl
PFS
12 mo
8 mo
5 mo
G3+ AE
12%
18%
Dosing
q3w
qw
15

Core Visual Aid Testing

Rank-and-react testing of detail aid pages — find your narrative anchor and the page that closes the prescribing decision.

Rank these pages in order of most motivating to least.

P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

Drag to reorder Most motivating

Message Testing

Compare message frames head-to-head, identify which claims move likelihood to prescribe, and stress-test alternate framings.

Select the message most motivating to prescribe.

  • M1Reduces annual exacerbations vs. SOC
  • M2Reduces oral corticosteroid burden
  • M3Improves FEV1 in 4 weeks
More use cases being added

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Each persona is constructed from a foundation of past primary market research (anonymized and aggregated) combined with public clinical, prescribing, and behavioral signals. We do not impersonate individual physicians — personas represent statistically grounded behavioral archetypes within a specialty, geography, and practice setting.

  • nQuorate is designed for the early, iterative, directional studies where speed matters most — concept testing, message refinement, TPP stress-testing, segmentation hypotheses. For decisions requiring statistically powered sample sizes against regulators or payers, traditional fielded studies remain the gold standard. Many of our customers use nQuorate to converge fast, then field the final cut.

  • We benchmark persona responses against held-out fielded studies and track directional accuracy over time. Each study includes confidence indicators that flag when a question lies outside the persona’s validated response space.

  • Oncology, cardiovascular, immunology, neurology, metabolic, and rare disease are live, with new areas onboarded as we add design partners. Coverage spans US and EU5 across academic, community, and IDN settings.

  • We do not store HCP PII. The platform is built with Fortune 500 procurement, legal, and IT review in mind — including data residency, SSO, audit logging, and signed master agreements. Compliance documentation is available under NDA.

  • We’re onboarding a small group of design partners at preferred pricing. Get in touch and we’ll walk you through plans tailored to your team’s research volume.

Design Partner Program

Help shape the platform.

nQuorate is in active development. We’re inviting brand and insights teams to pilot the panel on live research questions.

We’ll only use your details to follow up about the pilot program.